πŸ“»

bb-TBC-19

AssociationsMike Coles
Attachments
DestinationNLRTBC
EisenhowerImportanturgent
Last Contact
Notes
Now withRon B
Pete, Dan meet upA day in the life of Moses Pt1
Read attached docs
StatusAudacity PPRecordedScreenflow PP
Target Date
TypeBible SeriesNLRPreaching
days left7
with Allan H
with Ron B

bb-TBC-19 "A Day in the Life of Moses: Part 1"

Introduction

Haven't we been here before? That's usually the reaction to reading the book of Deuteronomy for the first time, and the reaction is understandable, that's why it's called 'deutero-second' and 'nomos-law'. It is the second giving of the law and the whole book is the account of a single day. It is another illustration of the variable passage of time that we find in the chapter by chapter reading of the Scriptures. In fact, it seems it was Moses' last day.

The people group that witnessed Sinai are now mostly buried in the wilderness; this is a new generation. Aaron the Anointed Priest is dead, so is his sister Miriam. Moses and the people of Jehovah stand on the threshold of great changes. Moses, however, will not enjoy them; his journey has come to its end.

Starting all over again

Then a clear distinction between the Abrahamic Covenant and the Sinai Covenant

The Tenancy Agreement

We have referred already to the Sinai Covenant as being 'land based'. It is in Deuteronomy that we see this worked out thoroughly. Deuteronomy is not merely a re-run of Exodus and Sinai. It is the original Sinal Covenant reapplied with a particular end in view.

The particular focus of Deuteronomy is the connection between the keeping of the Sinai Covenant and the Possession of the Promised Land.

Achan and the broken covenant

The conquering people had taken Jericho and the next town en route was Ai. But they were presumptuous in their expectation of an easy victory and the wilful disobedience of one man brought a simple victory to a crushing defeat. In the whole conquest of Canaan it is the only battle that has a 'body count' for the forces of the Covenant people. The whole story is found in Joshua 7, but we will focus on the indictment that was brought against the nation and Achan in particular.

This principle has long-term implications; only a Covenant keeping people could conquer the land and only a Covenant keeping people would be able to hold it. Keeping the Covenant gave them gave them 'access' into their tenancy and keeping the Covenant was their tenancy agreement.

Let the buyer beware

This is another Bible detail to keep in mind. The nation of Israel never owned the promised land; they were tenants. In English law the purchase of a property may be freehold or leasehold. If I buy a property that is legally 'leasehold' I am really only 'renting' the land on which the house is sitting. At the end of the leasehold period the land, and anything I have built on it must revert to the owner of the land. If I buy my house 'freehold' I am buying both the building and the land.

The nation of Israel and its families held their land 'leasehold', the land-owner was Jehovah himself;

Technically property, under the Sinai Covenant, could not be 'sold' permanently outside the family. Each generation of the family held the property in trust for the next generation and the land belonged to Jehovah.

On entering the Promised Land these territories were entrusted to the different family tribes. Every 50 years each portion of the land had to revert to its original family. This plan ensured that wealthy landowners did not accumulate vast estates that would have created a permanent 'underclass' of 'farm workers' rather than 'farm owners'.

This seems to have been greatly ignored and the property owners caused much personal hardship to peasant families. They incurred a strong indictment from the prophet Isaiah.

So the land owning tycoons put the whole Covenant community in jeopardy of losing their promised land; this was written into the deeds. At so many points the Covenant people held their Covnenanted Land by a thread. and meanwhile all day long God held out his arms...